Coping behavior of students as a means of overcoming stressful situations under martial law
 
More details
Hide details
1
National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine, Ukraine
 
2
Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine, Ukraine
 
3
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Lviv, Ukraine, Ukraine
 
4
Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Drohobych, Ukraine, Ukraine
 
5
Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A. S. Makarenko, Sumy, Ukraine, Ukraine
 
 
Submission date: 2024-12-20
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-02-11
 
 
Publication date: 2025-02-28
 
 
Corresponding author
Olha I. Okhrimenko   

National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine, Ukraine
 
 
Wiadomości Lekarskie 2025;(2):281-287
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
other
 
ABSTRACT
Aim:
The aim is to study the peculiarities of students' coping behavior in stressful situations under martial law.

Material and methods:
During the 2023-2024 academic year, the research was conducted based among 3rd-year students (n = 82) aged 20-22 years, including women (n = 42) and men (n = 40). Research methods: bibliosemantic, diagnostic, system analysis and generalization, statistical. The diagnostic work involved using the following methods: “Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations” and “Strategic Approach to Coping Scale.”

Results:
It has been found that the problem of students being in a stressful situation of war is directly related to their coping behavior. It has been found that female students’ indicators of emotion-oriented coping strategies are more pronounced than those of male students (p < 0.05). Male students often demonstrate coping behavior focused on solving various problems (problem-oriented strategy). It has been found that students have a significantly (p > 0.05) high level of expression of the following models of behavior to overcome stressful phenomena: search for social support (women – 57.1 %; men – 55.0 %), social contact (women – 54.8 %; men – 52.5 %), precautionary actions (women – 52.4 %; men – 50.0 %).

Conclusions:
The effectiveness of any coping strategy depends on the current situation in students’ lives and their existing personal resources. In stressful situations, students’ coping behavior is effective, and the following coping strategies are rational: emotion-oriented, search for social support, and problem-oriented. This confirms students’ productive personal standpoint, allowing them to adapt to any stressful situation under martial law.
REFERENCES (23)
1.
Zasiekina L, Duchyminska T, Bifulco A, Bignardi G. War trauma impacts in Ukrainian combat and civilian populations: Moral injury and associated mental health symptoms. Mil Psychol. 2024;36(5):555-566. doi:10.1080/08995605.2023.2235256.
 
2.
Cameron N. Child growth and armed conflict. Ann Hum Biol. 2023;50(1):301-307. doi:10.1080/03014460.2023.2224059.
 
3.
Zielinska M, Tkachenko Y, Ducki M. The war in Ukraine: A voice from Poland. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2022;41(3):101062. doi:10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101062.
 
4.
Bendavid E, Boerma T, Akseer N, et al. The effects of armed conflict on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2021;397(10273):522-532. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00131-8.
 
5.
Harb GC, Schultz JH. The nature of posttraumatic nightmares and school functioning in war-affected youth. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0242414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242414.
 
6.
Shaheen M, Schindler L, Saar-Ashkenazy R, et al. Victims of war-Psychoendocrine evidence for the impact of traumatic stress on psychological well-being of adolescents growing up during the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Psychophysiology. 2020;57(1):e13271. doi:10.1111/psyp.13271.
 
7.
Wei Y, Shi Y, Zhou Q, Zhu R, Wang L. Effect of Chinese young children’s epidemic cognition on their coping behavior: Mediating role of emotion. BMC Psychol. 2023;11(1):65. doi:10.1186/s40359-023-01106-5.
 
8.
Taylor SE, Stanton AL. Coping resources, coping processes, and mental health. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:377-401. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091520.
 
9.
Woo SE, Hofmans J, Wille B, Tay L. Person-centered modeling: Techniques for studying associations between people rather than variables. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2024;11:453-480. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-045646.
 
10.
Jong A, Riddleston L, Mathur M, et al. Young people’s recommended coping strategies to manage social isolation: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in the UK. Curr Res Behav Sci. 2023;5:100133. doi:10.1016/j.crbeha.2023.100133.
 
11.
McLoughlin E, Arnold R, Moore LJ. The tendency to appraise stressful situations as more of a threat is associated with poorer health and well-being. Stress Health. 2024;40(3):e3358. doi:10.1002/smi.3358.
 
12.
Okhrimenko IM, Fedyk AO, Zhygalkina NV, et al. Changes in somatic and mental health indicators of instructor-officers under stress Wiad Lek. 2024;77(2):293-298. doi:10.36740/WLek202402116.
 
13.
Choi Y, Moon E, Park JM, et al. Psychometric properties of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations in Korean adults. Psychiatry Investig. 2017;14(4):427-433. doi:10.4306/pi.2017.14.4.427.
 
14.
Pedrero Pérez EJ, Santed Germán MA, Pérez García AM. Adaptación española de la Escala Multiaxial de Afrontamiento Estratégico (SACS) de Hobfoll [Spanish adaptation of Hobfoll’s Strategic Approach to Coping Scale (SACS)]. Psicothema. 2012;24(3):455-460.
 
15.
Cordes MF, Ahmed AE, Singer DE. Psychological distress in active-duty U.S. service members who utilized mental health services: Data from a 2018 DoD survey. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.11.051.
 
16.
Graves BS, Hall ME, Dias-Karch C, Haischer MH, Apter C. Gender differences in perceived stress and coping among college students. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(8):e0255634. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255634.
 
17.
Montero-Marin J, Prado-Abril J, Piva Demarzo MM, Gascon S, García-Campayo J. Coping with stress and types of burnout: Explanatory power of different coping strategies. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e89090. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089090.
 
18.
Okhrimenko IМ, Barko VV, Vavryk LV, et al. The impact of professional stress on the mental health of law enforcement officers. Wiad Lek. 2023;76(6):1428-1435. doi:10.36740/WLek202306115.
 
19.
Batrinos ML. Testosterone and aggressive behavior in man. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;10(3):563-568. doi:10.5812/ijem.3661.
 
20.
Yevdokimova O, Okhrimenko I. Coping strategies for overcoming stress in atypical situations. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience. 2020;11(2Sup1):56-63. doi:10.18662/brain/11.2Sup1/94.
 
21.
Zhang Y, Luo X, Che X, Duan W. Protective Effect of Self-Compassion to Emotional Response among Students with Chronic Academic Stress. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1802. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01802.
 
22.
Garbarino J. The war-zone mentality − mental health effects of gun violence in U.S. children and adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(13):1149-1151. doi:10.1056/NEJMp2209422.
 
23.
Taghavi K, Isaacs D, McLeod L, Gillett G, Brasher C. The ethics of war-time data in paediatric trauma: Attitudes, angles and impacts. BMJ Glob Health. 2023;7(Suppl 8):e013071. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013071.
 
eISSN:2719-342X
ISSN:0043-5147
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top